Workout Gap Analysis, Visualized
Optima analyzes your weekly training program and renders a 3D anatomical heatmap showing which muscles are well-covered and which are under-trained. Instead of counting weekly sets, the scoring model uses a frequency-based motor unit recruitment framework to evaluate muscle coverage — reflecting current hypertrophy research on stimulating reps and proximity to failure.
How the Scoring Works
Green
Trained in 2+ sessions per week with sufficient stimulating reps. This muscle is well-covered by your program.
Yellow
Trained but only in one session, or hit across multiple sessions without enough stimulating reps to drive adaptation.
Red
No stimulating reps in any session — a gap in your program that may limit balanced development.
How to Use It
Paste any text-format weekly routine — from spreadsheets, training apps, or a plain text list — and see your muscle coverage visualized across approximately 50 individual muscles. You can also drag and drop screenshots or spreadsheet files. The analysis runs in seconds and nothing is stored.
Why Frequency, Not Volume
Most workout trackers score muscle coverage by counting weekly sets. Optima uses a different lens: how many separate sessions deliver stimulating reps to each muscle, and whether those reps are close enough to failure to recruit high-threshold motor units. This matters because post-workout fatigue reduces motor unit recruitment in later sets — meaning more sets in a single session eventually hit diminishing returns. Spreading stimulus across sessions is what drives growth.
Your Data
Workout text or images are processed in real time via the Anthropic API and discarded immediately. No accounts, no cookies, no storage. See the Privacy Policy for details.